Indigenous Woman

Indigenous Woman

Monday, 18 November 2013

Human Rights Investigator says Canada needs and Inquiry for missing Aboriginal women.

UN human rights investigator says Canada needs inquiry into missing aboriginal women

The federal government should set up a national inquiry into the “disturbing phenomenon” of missing and murdered aboriginal women, a senior UN rights official said Tuesday.
James Anaya, the UN special rapporteur on the rights of indigenous peoples, has spent the last nine days touring the country, talking to aboriginals and both federal and provincial government officials.

More Related to this Story

And while governments across Canada have pledged a number of steps to deal with the problem of missing aboriginal women, it’s not enough, Anaya told a news conference in Ottawa as he wrapped up his visit.
“I have heard from Aboriginal Peoples a widespread lack of confidence in the effectiveness of those measures,” Anaya said.
“I concur that a comprehensive and nationwide inquiry into the issue could help ensure a co-ordinated response and the opportunity for the loved ones of victims to be heard and would demonstrate a responsiveness to the concerns raised by the families and communities affected by this epidemic.”
There has been strong pressure from aboriginal groups and some provinces for an inquiry into the disappearances, which some say run into the hundreds. The Native Women’s Association of Canada estimates there have been more than 600 such cases in the last 20 years.
The federal government, however, has so far refused to entertain the idea of an inquiry.
Anaya, a professor of human rights law at the University of Arizona, also has a Canadian connection, having done several stints as a visiting professor in the law faculty of the University of Toronto.
He acknowledged that Canada has made significant progress on aboriginal issues since his predecessor delivered a tough report in 2004. But many challenges remain, he said.
“Canada faces a crisis when it comes to the situation of indigenous peoples of the country,” Anaya said.
The economic gap between aboriginals and non-aboriginals hasn’t narrowed, treaty and land claims remain unresolved and “there appear to be high levels of distrust among aboriginal peoples towards government at both the federal and provincial levels.”
Liberal aboriginal affairs critic Carolyn Bennett pounced on Anaya’s report as evidence of a hard-hearted Conservative attitude towards Canada’s First Nations.
“The Conservatives’ adversarial approach to Aboriginal Peoples on a host of issues has created conflict and distrust, rather than reconciliation and better lives,” Bennett said.
“As Mr. Anaya noted today, Canada needs to change direction urgently towards a new, collaborative partnership with Aboriginal Peoples to achieve progress and shared prosperity.”
Anaya also noted that aboriginal education in Canada could be improved quickly if money given to native authorities for schooling was equal, on a per-student basis, to spending in the provincial system.
But he warned the federal government against going ahead with its proposed First Nations education bill. He said he heard “a remarkably consistent and profound distrust” about the measure and urged the government to take its time and redraft the legislation in consultation with aboriginals.
Anaya also said housing remains a dismal problem.
“I urge the government to treat the housing situation on First Nations reserves and Inuit communities with the urgency it deserves,” he said.
“It simply cannot be acceptable that these conditions persist in the midst of a country with such great wealth.”
Anaya also said the residential-schools era continues to cast “a shadow of despair” over aboriginal communities and he urged the government to extend the mandate of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission to as long as it needs to do its work.

Monday, 29 July 2013

Tar Sands, Tankers and Pipelines.

Tar Sands, Tankers & Pipelines
For decades a federal moratorium has protected British Columbia’s sensitive northern waters from crude oil tankers. All that will change if currently proposed oil pipelines are built from the Alberta tar sands to the coast of BC’s Great Bear Rainforest.

For example, the Enbridge Northern Gateway project proposes two parallel 1,150-kilometre pipelines across northern BC – crossing hundreds of important fish-bearing rivers and streams. One pipeline would carry an estimated 525,000 barrels a day of crude oil from the Alberta tar sands to Kitimat, BC; the second pipeline would carry 150,000 barrels a day of condensate in the other direction (a chemical and petroleum mixture used to dilute tar sands crude oil extracted so that it can travel by pipeline) from Kitimat to the Alberta tar sands. Despite safety measures, oil pipelines leak – and a leak into BC’s rivers could bring terrible consequences for fish, animals and birds, and communities that rely on those rivers for food sources and water.

If these pipelines are built, about 225 oil tankers, including massive supertankers, would carry their loads to and from BC’s Pacific North Coast every year. The waters of the north coast are notoriously dangerous and difficult to navigate. With that much tanker traffic carrying tar sands oil to Asian markets, BC can likely expect many small spills every year and a catastrophic spill of over 10,000 barrels every 12 years (figures based on a report from Simon Fraser University). British Columbia would be vulnerable to an oil spill disaster on the scale of the Exxon Valdez, which could devastate the coastal environment and way of life for generations.

While oil pipelines and tankers threaten to have potentially devastating and long-term environmental impacts, the economic benefits of the Enbridge pipeline are limited, and most of the employment will be short-term. West Coast Environmental Law is working with allies to strengthen the long-standing federal moratorium on oil tanker traffic by having it protected through federal legislation. This would put an end to all plans for oil tankers and pipelines in the Great Bear Rainforest. West Coast’s goal is to limit the expansion of tar sands infrastructure in BC and protect our watersheds, marine and terrestrial ecosystems, and the human communities that rely on them.

The proposed pipeline and tanker routes pass through the territories of many First Nations. Numerous BC First Nations oppose these plans. West Coast Environmental Law has been providing strategic legal advice to a number of First Nations in relation to the issues of oil tankers and pipelines in their waters and on their lands.

Interested in learning more about how the Tar Sands, Tankers, and Pipelines affect our Province? Want to know how you may particiapte in the Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipeline Joint Review Panel Hearings? Below is a selection of publications produced by West Coast Environmental Law on these and other related topics.

Publication:

Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipeline risks for downstream communities and fisheries: West Coast's analysis of how a spill along the proposed Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipeline will impact downstream communities and ecosystems.